<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why you May NOT Want to Use eHow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/not-use-ehow/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/not-use-ehow</link>
	<description>Passive Income Ideas and Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Howie</title>
		<link>http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/not-use-ehow/comment-page-1#comment-31738</link>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/?p=4627#comment-31738</guid>
		<description>&quot;eHow Goes Under – While their are no current signs that would suggest eHow going under or shutting down, the risk is still there. Who knows, 5 or 10 years from now things could be a lot different. Just remember that by using a site like eHow, you have given up some control compared to launching your own site(s).&quot;

I am a HUGE proponent of diversifying online revenue streams....there are some very major things, however, that eHow needs to correct ASAP if it wants to remain a formidable leader in the article submission/revenue sharing game.....the truth is, there are a few up and coming websites that, are spearhead by determined young entrepreneur, who&#039;s service offerings, and overall business models, will offer eHow a run for their money....

Keep an eye out for Info Barrel. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;eHow Goes Under – While their are no current signs that would suggest eHow going under or shutting down, the risk is still there. Who knows, 5 or 10 years from now things could be a lot different. Just remember that by using a site like eHow, you have given up some control compared to launching your own site(s).&#8221;</p>
<p>I am a HUGE proponent of diversifying online revenue streams&#8230;.there are some very major things, however, that eHow needs to correct ASAP if it wants to remain a formidable leader in the article submission/revenue sharing game&#8230;..the truth is, there are a few up and coming websites that, are spearhead by determined young entrepreneur, who&#8217;s service offerings, and overall business models, will offer eHow a run for their money&#8230;.</p>
<p>Keep an eye out for Info Barrel. <img src='http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passivefamilyincome</title>
		<link>http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/not-use-ehow/comment-page-1#comment-28352</link>
		<dc:creator>passivefamilyincome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 04:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/?p=4627#comment-28352</guid>
		<description>@Writing for money - It was my understanding that there were several factors taken into account when identifying which posts to purge.  I believe as a general rule of thumb, articles that appear to be spammy or are written not conforming to the &quot;How To&quot; format were potentially purged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Writing for money &#8211; It was my understanding that there were several factors taken into account when identifying which posts to purge.  I believe as a general rule of thumb, articles that appear to be spammy or are written not conforming to the &#8220;How To&#8221; format were potentially purged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passivefamilyincome</title>
		<link>http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/not-use-ehow/comment-page-1#comment-28344</link>
		<dc:creator>passivefamilyincome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/?p=4627#comment-28344</guid>
		<description>@Rich - Thanks for stopping by the site.  I understand writers frustration with the purging of articles, but overall I think it makes eHow a much better site with a good reputation.  That makes me want to keep using this great tool to build passive income, even though I lost a few articles myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rich &#8211; Thanks for stopping by the site.  I understand writers frustration with the purging of articles, but overall I think it makes eHow a much better site with a good reputation.  That makes me want to keep using this great tool to build passive income, even though I lost a few articles myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passivefamilyincome</title>
		<link>http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/not-use-ehow/comment-page-1#comment-28341</link>
		<dc:creator>passivefamilyincome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/?p=4627#comment-28341</guid>
		<description>@Captain - InfoBarrel will probably be next on my list after I finish this months challenge writing for HubPages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Captain &#8211; InfoBarrel will probably be next on my list after I finish this months challenge writing for HubPages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writing for money online</title>
		<link>http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/not-use-ehow/comment-page-1#comment-28340</link>
		<dc:creator>Writing for money online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.passivefamilyincome.com/?p=4627#comment-28340</guid>
		<description>after reading richs comment,So the eHow purge was of articles that were deemed lower quality or in the wrong format?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after reading richs comment,So the eHow purge was of articles that were deemed lower quality or in the wrong format?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
